22/04/2004
When you purchase a second-hand car, whether it’s from a large dealership like Arnold Clark or a smaller independent seller, you expect a certain level of reliability. While minor issues can crop up, a persistent fault that multiple repair attempts fail to resolve can be incredibly frustrating and disruptive. This often leads car owners to question their rights and the responsibility of the seller. Let's delve into whether Arnold Clark services second-hand cars and, more importantly, what recourse you have when a recurring problem seems unfixable.

Arnold Clark, as one of the UK’s largest independent car retailers, indeed provides servicing for vehicles, including those they have sold as second-hand. They operate a vast network of service centres designed to handle everything from routine maintenance to complex fault diagnosis and repair. When you purchase a vehicle from them, whether new or used, it typically comes with some form of warranty or guarantee, providing peace of mind for a initial period. However, the true test of a dealership's aftercare service often comes when a significant or recurring fault emerges, as highlighted by your experience with the 'AS&G System Service Required' message.
Understanding Your Initial Warranty and Consumer Rights
Your situation, where a fault appeared within weeks of purchase and within the 60-day warranty period, immediately brings your consumer rights into play. While the 60-day warranty is a welcome layer of protection offered by Arnold Clark, it's crucial to understand that your rights extend beyond this under UK law, specifically the Consumer Rights Act 2015. This Act is designed to protect consumers when they buy goods, including second-hand cars, from a trader.
Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, goods must be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, and as described. 'Satisfactory quality' takes into account the age and mileage of a second-hand car, but it still means the car should be free from significant defects and perform as expected. A persistent fault, even if it doesn't immediately affect drivability, undermines the expectation of satisfactory quality, especially when it relates to a system designed to improve fuel efficiency.
The Act outlines several key rights:
- Short-term right to reject (0-30 days): If a fault appears within 30 days of purchase, you have the right to reject the car and get a full refund. This period had passed in your case, but it's important for others to know.
- Right to repair or replacement (30 days to 6 months): If a fault develops after 30 days but within six months of purchase, the seller gets one opportunity to repair or replace the faulty goods. If this repair or replacement is unsuccessful, or if it causes you significant inconvenience, you then have the right to a refund (with a deduction for usage) or a price reduction. The burden of proof is on the dealer to show the fault wasn't present at the time of sale.
- After six months: Your rights still exist, but the burden of proof shifts to you to prove the fault was present at the time of sale.
The Persistent AS&G System Fault: A Case for Action
Your experience with the 'AS&G System Service Required' fault, leading to five repair attempts for the same issue over 12 months, is a classic example of a recurring problem that falls squarely under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The AS&G (Automatic Stop & Go, or Start-Stop) system is designed to improve fuel efficiency by shutting off the engine when the car is stationary and restarting it automatically when the driver is ready to move. While its malfunction might not immediately compromise safety or drivability, it is a feature that is *meant* to work and contributes to the overall functionality and value of the vehicle.
The fact that Arnold Clark has attempted repairs multiple times, even sending the vehicle to Mitsubishi (the manufacturer), yet the issue persists, strongly indicates that their attempts have been unsuccessful. Furthermore, the sheer number of visits (around 10, including inspections and part ordering) and the necessity to take time away from work constitutes significant inconvenience. This is a critical point in your favour when asserting your rights.
Your Rights: Refusing Further Work and Claiming a Partial Refund
Given the history of failed repair attempts and the significant inconvenience caused, you are absolutely within your rights to refuse any further repair work by Arnold Clark for this specific, recurring fault. Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, if the first attempt at repair (or replacement) is unsuccessful, or if it's not carried out within a reasonable time or without significant inconvenience, you have additional remedies. In your case, after five failed attempts, it's clear the repair has not been successful.
Your primary options at this stage are:
- A final right to reject the car: This would mean returning the car and getting a refund, though the refund amount would be reduced to account for the use you've had of the vehicle since purchase.
- A price reduction: This is where your request for a partial refund comes in. You can keep the car but demand a reduction in the purchase price to reflect the diminished value due to the persistent, unfixable fault and the inconvenience you've endured. This is often a more realistic and practical option for both parties, especially after a year of ownership.
Is claiming a partial refund realistic? Yes, it is very realistic and a valid right under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The Act specifically allows for a price reduction if the goods are not of satisfactory quality and a repair or replacement has failed. The amount of the price reduction should reflect the difference between the price paid and the actual value of the car with the fault, along with compensation for the inconvenience. While quantifying this can be tricky, it should be a reasonable sum that you feel compensates you for the ongoing issue and disruption.
How to Pursue a Partial Refund
To formally pursue a partial refund, you should take the following steps:
- Gather Documentation: Compile all records of your car's purchase, the warranty, and every single visit to Arnold Clark for the AS&G system issue. This includes dates, what was supposedly done, and any communication (emails, letters, service reports).
- Formal Communication: Write a formal letter or email to Arnold Clark's customer service department, clearly stating your case.
- State Your Position: In your communication, explain:
- The history of the recurring fault and the multiple (unsuccessful) repair attempts.
- The significant inconvenience you've suffered (time off work, numerous visits).
- Your reliance on the Consumer Rights Act 2015, specifically your right to a price reduction due to the failed repairs and the car not being of satisfactory quality.
- That you are no longer willing to accept further repair attempts for this specific fault.
- Your proposal for a partial refund amount and why you believe it is fair.
- Set a Deadline: Give them a reasonable timeframe (e.g., 14 days) to respond.
If Arnold Clark does not agree to your proposed resolution, you can then consider escalating the matter. Many large dealerships, including Arnold Clark, are members of the Motor Ombudsman, an independent body that provides an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) service for consumers and the automotive industry. This is often the next logical step before considering court action.
Comparative Overview of Consumer Rights Remedies
To help illustrate your options, here's a brief comparison of the main remedies available under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 for faulty goods:
| Right/Remedy | Applicable Period | Key Conditions | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term Right to Reject | 0-30 days from purchase | Fault present at time of sale; significant defect. | Full refund. |
| Right to Repair/Replacement | 30 days - 6 months from purchase | Fault present at time of sale; seller gets one chance to repair/replace. | Successful repair or replacement. |
| Final Right to Reject | After failed repair/replacement (within 6 months) | Repair/replacement unsuccessful or caused significant inconvenience. | Refund (deduction for usage allowed). |
| Price Reduction | After failed repair/replacement (within 6 months, or after 6 months if fault proved) | Repair/replacement unsuccessful or caused significant inconvenience. | Keep the car, receive partial refund reflecting diminished value. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and how does it apply to second-hand cars?
A: The Consumer Rights Act 2015 is a UK law that sets out your legal rights when buying goods and services. For second-hand cars bought from a dealer, it means the car must be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, and as described. 'Satisfactory quality' considers the car's age, mileage, and price, but it must still be free from significant defects.
Q: How long do I have to return a faulty car?
A: You have a 'short-term right to reject' within 30 days for a full refund if a fault is present. After 30 days, you move to the right to repair or replacement. If repair/replacement fails, or causes significant inconvenience, you then have a 'final right to reject' or claim a price reduction.
Q: What if the dealer can't fix the problem after multiple attempts?
A: As per the Consumer Rights Act 2015, if a repair (or replacement) is unsuccessful after the first attempt, or if it causes you significant inconvenience, you are no longer obliged to accept further repairs. You then have the right to either a full refund (with a deduction for usage) or a price reduction.
Q: Can I get a partial refund instead of a full refund for a faulty car?
A: Yes, absolutely. If a repair or replacement has failed, or if it's not provided within a reasonable time or without significant inconvenience, you have the option to demand a price reduction (a partial refund) instead of rejecting the car entirely. This allows you to keep the vehicle but receive compensation for its diminished value due to the persistent fault.
Q: What is the Motor Ombudsman?
A: The Motor Ombudsman is an independent, not-for-profit organisation that provides free and impartial advice and an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) service for consumers and the automotive industry. If you can't resolve an issue directly with a dealership, and they are members of the Motor Ombudsman, you can escalate your complaint to them.
Q: Does Arnold Clark service any car, regardless of where it was bought?
A: While Arnold Clark primarily services vehicles they have sold, their service centres do offer general servicing and repairs for a wide range of makes and models, regardless of where the car was originally purchased. However, warranty claims for cars not purchased from them would need to be handled by the original seller or manufacturer's warranty provider.
Conclusion
Your situation is a clear demonstration of a consumer whose rights have been infringed due to a persistent and unfixable fault, despite multiple good-faith attempts by the dealer. While Arnold Clark does service second-hand cars and has attempted to rectify the issue free of charge, the repeated failures and the significant inconvenience caused empower you to take a stronger stance. You are well within your rights to refuse further repair attempts for this specific fault and instead pursue a partial refund for the vehicle under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Document everything, communicate formally, and be prepared to escalate your complaint to the Motor Ombudsman if a satisfactory resolution isn't reached directly. Your patience has been tested, and now it's time to assert your consumer rights for a fair outcome.
If you want to read more articles similar to Arnold Clark Servicing: Your Rights With Faulty Used Cars, you can visit the Vehicles category.
