10/03/2025
TBR Global Chauffeuring, a prominent name in the world of ground transportation, prides itself on delivering a safe, high-quality service. Their success is built upon a proprietary booking system, an extensive affiliate network, and a team of dedicated experts. However, to maintain the trust of their prestigious clientele, particularly within demanding sectors like financial roadshows and corporate travel, TBR needed a robust communication system. Initially, TBR Global Chauffeuring relied on Microsoft Outlook to manage its vast array of communications with both its driver agency suppliers and its diverse client base. While Outlook is a ubiquitous tool, TBR soon encountered significant hurdles as their operations expanded, ultimately prompting a search for a more effective solution.

The Challenges with Outlook
The primary issues that plagued TBR's use of Outlook stemmed from its limitations in handling complex, high-volume communication workflows. As the company grew, these shortcomings became increasingly detrimental to productivity and efficiency.
Message Ownership Ambiguity
One of the most pressing challenges was Outlook's lack of a straightforward mechanism for establishing clear message ownership. To circumvent this, TBR staff resorted to a workaround: assigning messages to specific individuals using pre-built Categories within Outlook. However, this method was far from ideal. Categories were notoriously slow to synchronise across different Outlook clients. This meant that an agent might begin drafting a response to a client or supplier, only to discover that another team member had already been assigned the same task. This not only led to wasted effort as drafts had to be discarded but also hindered the team's ability to meet their aggressive 15-minute response time Service Level Agreement (SLA). The duplication of effort significantly impacted agent productivity, forcing them to constantly seek out new tasks.
Performance Degradation and Inbox Overload
Beyond the ownership issue, Outlook's performance began to falter under the weight of TBR's operational needs. The more folders employees created to organise their communications, the slower Outlook became. This gradual degradation in performance meant that simple tasks took longer, eating into valuable working time. Compounding this problem was Outlook's shared inbox limit. As TBR's volume of communications grew, they hit this limit, necessitating the creation of three additional online Outlook inboxes for their staff to monitor, on top of the twelve they were already managing. This fragmented approach to communication management was inefficient and prone to errors.
Syncing and Configuration Headaches
Lukasz Biegus, CTO of TBR Global Chauffeuring, highlighted the significant time lost due to these system inefficiencies: "Syncing folder-by-folder and jumping between 2 tools and 15 inboxes took minutes to tens of minutes." Furthermore, every time an employee received a new PC, Outlook would require re-configuration, a tedious and time-consuming process that further hampered productivity. The inability to automate processes or even measure the impact of potential automation on employee efficiency and response times was a critical drawback.
Seeking a Superior Solution
Recognising these significant limitations, TBR's leadership team began to explore alternative solutions. This was not their first attempt to move away from Outlook; a previous attempt to implement a ticketing system had failed due to the drastic changes it would have required in their teams' working methods. Determined to avoid a similar outcome, TBR undertook a thorough evaluation of three potential vendors, prioritising a solution that offered a seamless transition and minimal disruption to their established workflows.
The Front Advantage
After careful consideration, Front emerged as the preferred solution. Its user-friendly interface, extensibility, and omnichannel capabilities were highly appealing. Crucially, Front's team assured TBR of a "painless transition from Outlook." Lukasz Biegus noted, "Front was by far the best for our needs and would require the least change in the way that we work." This promise of minimal disruption was a key factor in their decision.
Transforming Operations with Front
The implementation of Front marked a significant turning point for TBR Global Chauffeuring, addressing the very challenges that had plagued their Outlook usage and unlocking new levels of efficiency and collaboration.
Real-Time Automation and Clear Ownership
Front's shared inboxes provided a centralised platform for all communications, offering clear ownership in real-time. Unlike Outlook's delayed synchronisation, assignments in Front are immediate, eliminating the possibility of duplicate responses and ensuring that each message is handled by the appropriate team member. This real-time assignment capability was vital for maintaining their stringent 15-minute response SLA. Furthermore, Front's direct integration with TBR's internal planning and booking system, TBROS, allowed team members to effortlessly pull quotes, convert them into bookings, and access crucial client information, streamlining the entire response process.
Streamlined Workflows with Routing Rules
TBR leveraged Front's powerful routing rules to optimise its shared inboxes and backend processes. These rules enabled them to:
- Separate client communications from supplier and IT emails, allowing for easier prioritisation.
- Auto-archive out-of-office replies and specific TBROS-generated emails, reducing inbox clutter.
- Tag conversations for efficient categorisation and future reference.
- Automatically apply SLAs to client messages, guaranteeing timely responses.
These automation features not only significantly reduced email traffic but also simplified data collection, with Front becoming the company's definitive source of truth for account data. Lukasz Biegus stated, "We’ve cut the volume of certain reservation inboxes easily by 50%, and now Front acts as our source of truth for account data."
Enhanced Collaboration and Faster Resolution
TBR's clients expect comprehensive, high-quality responses delivered promptly. Front's shared inboxes facilitate effective collaboration, allowing team members to work together on crafting emails for the most accurate and personalised client interactions. For complex issues requiring input from multiple team members, the ability to highlight relevant text and loop in colleagues into shared drafts ensures that client queries are always addressed efficiently and completely. This shared visibility was a stark contrast to the cumbersome process of forwarding lengthy handover emails in Outlook.
Measurable Improvements with Native Analytics
A critical advantage of Front was its native Analytics feature, which provided TBR with the ability to measure key metrics such as response times, peak operational hours, and the volume of different request types. This level of insight, which was entirely absent in Outlook, enabled TBR to make data-driven decisions and continuously improve their operations. The ability to track and analyse performance allowed them to identify areas for further optimisation.

Significant Time Savings and ROI
TBR also capitalised on Front's dynamic objects to automatically attach clickable links to records within TBROS, eliminating the need for manual searching of quote and booking information. This single workflow enhancement was estimated to save 20 working days per year. Furthermore, Front's ability to keep threads organised and allow team members to pull all historic exchanges related to specific TBROS IDs significantly reduced the time spent searching for information. For requests involving multiple parties, the use of Front's linked conversations ensured all follow-up emails were seamlessly associated with the original request. These combined automation and productivity features resulted in an estimated 11,000 hours saved in their first year of using Front, which translated into five deferred hires and an impressive 225% ROI. As Lukasz Biegus noted, "We’re able to handle a similar volume of emails as we had in 2019 with 25% less staff. It’s really made us more efficient."
The Future with Front
TBR Global Chauffeuring is enthusiastic about the future potential of Front. They anticipate the platform playing an even more critical role in their expansion and retention strategies as they plan to support additional communication channels, such as SMS and potentially WhatsApp. The continuous introduction of new features by Front further solidifies their confidence in the platform's ability to support their evolving business needs.
In essence, Front has empowered TBR Global Chauffeuring to maintain its unwavering commitment to quality, achieving this with greater efficiency and significant time savings. The move from Outlook was not merely a technological upgrade; it was a strategic decision that fundamentally enhanced their operational capabilities and client service delivery.
Why Choose TBR Global Chauffeuring?
TBR Global Chauffeuring distinguishes itself through its meticulous approach to vehicle provision. They combine their own premium fleet with access to a global network of TBR-approved affiliates. Every affiliate adheres to TBR's self-imposed high standards, ensuring a consistent level of excellence across all services. Regardless of your travel destination, you can be confident in experiencing the renowned TBR standard. TBR offers a diverse range of elite vehicle options, which vary depending on the specific region. Potential clients are encouraged to select their preferred region to view representative vehicles and understand the calibre of service they can expect.
Key Takeaways:
| Feature/Challenge | Outlook | Front |
|---|---|---|
| Message Ownership | Ambiguous, relied on manual Categories, slow sync | Clear, real-time assignment, eliminates duplicates |
| Performance | Slowed with more folders, inbox limits | Fast, efficient, handles high volume |
| Collaboration | Forwarding emails, difficult to pinpoint details | Shared drafts, real-time co-editing, easy expert involvement |
| Automation | Limited, no impact measurement | Routing rules, auto-archiving, tagging, SLA application |
| Integration | None with TBROS | Direct integration with TBROS, dynamic objects |
| Analytics | None | Native analytics for key metrics |
| Time Savings | Significant time lost on syncing/organisation | Estimated 11,000 hours saved in Year 1, 20 days saved on specific task |
| ROI | Negative impact on productivity | 225% ROI, 5 deferred hires |
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Why did TBR Global Chauffeuring initially choose Outlook?
Outlook was likely chosen due to its widespread familiarity and its basic email management capabilities, which are standard for many businesses.
Q2: What were the main problems TBR faced with Outlook?
The primary issues included unclear message ownership, slow synchronisation of categories, poor performance as the number of folders increased, and limitations with shared inboxes, leading to duplicated effort and missed SLAs.
Q3: How did Front solve the message ownership problem?
Front provides real-time, clear assignment of messages within shared inboxes, ensuring that only one agent is working on a particular communication at any given time, thus preventing duplicate responses.
Q4: What is TBROS and how does Front integrate with it?
TBROS is TBR's proprietary internal planning and booking system. Front integrates directly with TBROS, allowing agents to easily access quotes, booking details, and other relevant information without leaving the platform, significantly speeding up response times.
Q5: How did Front improve collaboration within TBR?
Front's shared inboxes allow team members to collaborate on crafting responses in real-time, highlight specific text to loop in experts, and maintain shared visibility on client interactions, leading to more accurate and complete answers.
Q6: What kind of ROI did TBR achieve by switching to Front?
TBR achieved an estimated 225% ROI, largely due to significant time savings and the ability to handle increased volumes with fewer staff, effectively deferring five hires.
If you want to read more articles similar to Outlook's Shortcomings for TBR Global Chauffeuring, you can visit the Automotive category.
