What happens if shortcomings are found in MOT testing or operations?

Key MOT Guide Updates: Disciplinary Points & Roles

09/06/2015

Rating: 4.1 (1459 votes)

The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) has implemented significant updates to the MOT Testing Guide, bringing forth crucial changes that impact Authorised Examiners (AEs), AE Designated Managers (AEDMs), Testers, and the overall operation of Vehicle Testing Stations (VTS). Understanding these revisions is paramount for maintaining compliance, upholding the integrity of the MOT service, and avoiding severe disciplinary points that could lead to cessation of authorisation. This comprehensive overview aims to dissect the key alterations, from refined definitions and updated training mandates to the critical changes in disciplinary procedures and cessation periods.

Where can I find a copy of the MOT test manual?

These updates reflect the DVSA's ongoing commitment to enhancing road safety and ensuring the highest standards within the MOT testing service. Staying informed is not just good practice; it's a prerequisite for continued operation in the UK's automotive sector.

Table

Navigating the Evolving MOT Landscape

The foundation of the MOT service relies on clear definitions and roles. Several key abbreviations have been updated to reflect current operational realities and responsibilities within the VTS environment.

Refined Definitions: AED and AEDM

The definition of an AE Delegate (AED) has been refined. Previously, an AED was primarily seen as a temporary or permanent stand-in for the AE Designated Manager (AEDM). The updated definition clarifies that the AED is now a person appointed by the AEDM specifically to assist with administration and management functions. It remains critical to remember that this appointment does not devolve the ultimate responsibility held by the Authorised Examiner.

Similarly, the definition of the AE Designated Manager (AEDM) has seen a subtle but important change. While still the person representing the AE who has normally attended the MOT Management Course and typically an AE Principal, the previous phrasing implied that in larger organisations, the AEDM 'may be a senior manager with responsibility for the totality of the entity's MOT testing operations'. This has been streamlined to simply state they 'may be a senior manager with responsibility for the totality of the entity's MOT testing operations', removing the 'typically an AE Principal' from this specific context, while still acknowledging the AE Principal's role.

Updated Vehicle Test Classes

The classifications for motorcycles have been updated to include modern vehicle types, specifically electric variants:

  • Class 1 vehicles: Previously defined as motor bicycles (with or without sidecars) up to 200 cm3. This has been expanded to include motorcycles and motorcycle combinations up to 200cc and electrically powered solo motorcycles with not more than 4kW maximum continuous rated power and a maximum design speed up to 45km/h (28mph). This ensures clarity for the testing of low-power electric motorcycles.
  • Class 2 vehicles: Previously motor bicycles, other than mopeds, (including Class 1) (with or without sidecars). This is now simplified to encompass all motorcycles and motorcycle combinations, including electrically powered variants, other than those in category L1 (which is covered by Class 1). This broadens the scope to cover all standard motorcycles.

Enhanced Requirements for Authorised Examiners (AEs)

The DVSA has introduced several changes aimed at tightening corporate governance, training, and operational compliance for AEs.

Corporate Governance and Compliance

For companies controlling testing operations, the requirement for validating officer details has been updated. Instead of needing a copy of the company's registrar record, it is now explicitly stated that the directors must be recorded on the company’s register at Companies House. This streamlines the verification process and aligns with standard company registration practices.

A significant addition pertains to changes in business structure: any directors added to a currently Approved AE will now need to meet the current requirements, including undergoing a DBS check. This is a crucial safeguard for the integrity of the MOT service.

Mandatory Training for AEs and AEDMs

The training requirements for new AEs have been significantly clarified and strengthened. Previously, every new AE needed at least one person, the AEDM, to have attended a DVSA approved MOT managers course. The updated guidance now mandates that a DVSA approved MOT Managers course must be attended for each AE by both an AE Principal and the AE Designated Manager for that AE. This ensures that both key roles have a thorough understanding of their responsibilities within the MOT Service. Existing authorisations granted before 1 April 1995 that have not been subject to change remain exempt from this specific AEDM training requirement.

Partial Retests: The Brake Test Mandate

Guidance on partial retests has been clarified to ensure comprehensive checks. When a partial re-examination is permissible, the Tester must examine all failed defects (dangerous and major) and any items affected by the repair. Crucially, where applicable, the partial retest must now also include carrying out another brake performance test and entering the results into the MOT testing service. The tester must also check and mark as repaired any minor defects or advisory items from the initial test.

Post-Cessation Restrictions: A Clearer Stance

The rules regarding involvement in new authorisations after a disciplinary cessation have been broadened. Previously, a former AE could not be involved in management, but could continue as a tester if their nomination hadn't ceased, with some ambiguity regarding spouses or partners. The updated rule explicitly states that the former AE, including the AEDM and any individuals directly accountable in the cessation of the previous authorisation, shall not be involved in any way with the management or responsibility of any new authorisation. Furthermore, the spouse, partner, or family members of these individuals would now not be considered sufficiently independent, closing a potential loophole.

VTS Authorisation and Tester Appointment

The process of VTS authorisation and tester appointment has been refined. The previous bullet point regarding 'prospective testers' has been removed. Now, while authorisation to test can be granted without a tester present, the AE will not be able to test until a DVSA approved tester is appointed. Furthermore, the AE must appoint a tester and conduct MOT tests within 12 months of approval to retain their authorisation. Failure to do so will result in the VTS being deemed to have surrendered its approval.

Tester Roles and Eligibility: New Safeguards

The role of a Tester is fundamental to the MOT service, and new safeguards have been introduced to enhance trust and accountability.

DBS Checks: A New Standard for Testers

A significant change impacting new testers is the introduction of mandatory DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service) checks. From 1 April 2022, all new testers must undergo a DBS check as part of their eligibility criteria. This measure aims to bolster the integrity and trustworthiness of individuals conducting MOT tests.

Mandatory Roles and Training Revisions

The guidance on mandatory roles and training has been comprehensively updated. It clarifies that depending on business size, an individual can hold multiple roles. However, the roles of AE Principal and AEDM will be appointed by the DVSA based on the AE's application, with the remaining roles appointed by the AEDM. The previous statement that 'Not all mandatory roles require access to the MOT testing service' has been removed.

Regarding AEDM training, the updated guidance explicitly states that every AE is required to have an AEDM who, on behalf of the AE, is responsible for ensuring testing is carried out in compliance with the Requirements of Authorisation. While typically an internal person, it can also be a senior manager with responsibility for testing across the entire AE. The training requirements have been restructured to clearly explain the training of an AE Principal, especially where the AEDM is not the AE Principal.

In cases where the trained AEDM departs from an AE, the previous incorrect information regarding replacement timelines has been removed and updated to allow a consistent 35 working days to replace them in all cases, providing a clear window for continuity.

Disciplinary Procedures: Understanding the Impact

This is arguably the most critical area of change, directly affecting the consequences of non-compliance. The DVSA has revised aspects of cessation notices and the disciplinary points system.

Immediate Effect: New Cessation Timelines

For both Testers and AEs, the notice period before cessation becomes effective has been significantly tightened for serious cases. The previous '1 day' notice period for severe offences (e.g., 500 points or more for a Tester, or single offence cessation under Appendix 8.1 for an AE) has been replaced with 'Immediate effect'. This allows the DVSA to act more swiftly in cases posing a significant risk to road safety or the integrity of the MOT Service.

A new paragraph has been added to clarify that while cessation may be implemented with immediate effect in very serious cases (without the normal Contemplated Disciplinary letter or considering representation), the notice period for AEs and Testers may be extended to a maximum of 24 hours. During this brief period, testing may be monitored, and if anomalies are identified, the cessation will then take immediate effect. This allows for a final check while prioritising safety.

Revised Periods of Cessation

The bullet points detailing the period of cessation for both AEs and Testers have been revised, expanding from 3 options to 4. Notably, the previous bullet point for a 2-year cessation, which could be extended to 5 years for serious fraud, dishonesty, gross negligence, or repute under Appendix 8.1, has been replaced. The new wording for the 2-year period now specifies that it 'may be extended to 5 years where the cessation results from repeated shortcomings considered to have major road safety implications or damage the integrity of the MOT testing service'. A new, distinct bullet point has been added for a '5 years where the cessation results from a shortcoming(s) listed in Appendix 8.1', providing clearer categorisation of the most severe penalties.

Disciplinary Points System: A Detailed Breakdown

Appendix 8.2, which outlines the disciplinary points for various shortcomings, has been updated to improve understanding. While the point values largely remain the same, the descriptions are now more closely aligned with the categorisation of defects (dangerous, major, minor) as per the relevant inspection manual. This provides greater clarity and consistency in assessing faults.

Appendix 8.2: Disciplinary Points for Testers - Key Changes

Comparison of Old vs. New Disciplinary Point Descriptions
Offence Description (New Wording)Old PointsNew PointsNotes on Change
Any defect categorised as dangerous within the relevant inspection manual that is missed on a testable item.4040Clarified to align with 'dangerous' defect category.
Any defect categorised as major within the relevant inspection manual that is missed on a testable item.2020Clarified to align with 'major' defect category.
Item failed is not testable.2020No change.
Item failed has no defect (i.e., not a case involving an error of judgement).2020No change.
Any defect categorised as minor within the relevant inspection manual that is missed or incorrectly added.1010Clarified to align with 'minor' defect category.
Error of judgement: Judgement obviously significantly wrong – Dangerous defect advised.1010Clarified to specify 'Dangerous defect advised'.
Error of judgement: Judgement obviously wrong – Major defect advised.55Clarified to specify 'Major defect advised'.
Error of judgement: Judgement overruled but only marginally wrong – Minor defect advised.00Clarified to specify 'Minor defect advised'.

These clarifications ensure that the application of disciplinary points is more precise and directly linked to the seriousness of the defect category as defined in the MOT inspection manuals.

Other Notable Updates for Compliance

Beyond the core disciplinary changes, several other sections of the MOT Testing Guide have received updates to improve clarity and remove outdated information.

MOT Accounts and System Rules

The section on MOT accounts has seen the removal of references to GVTS, as this is no longer relevant. Furthermore, the entire section on System rules and user roles has undergone a major overhaul, with all information replaced and updated for improved guidance. This indicates a significant restructuring of how system access and user permissions are managed within the MOT testing service.

Training and Assessment Appendices

Appendix 1, previously titled 'MOT Manager Training', has been updated to 'MOT Management Training', reflecting a broader scope. This appendix has also been restructured with additional content to support the changes to AE Principal (AEP) and AEDM roles. The final information regarding cessation if a company is wound up or ceases to manage the VTS but the business continues under a former director/officer has been removed, streamlining the guidance.

Appendix 6 has also seen a minor but important update, with its section header changed from 'MOT annual training for testers' to 'MOT annual assessment and training for testers', emphasising the assessment component of annual tester compliance.

Convictions and Repute: Expanding the Scope

Appendix 7, which deals with convictions and repute, has expanded the list of individuals who must be free from conviction to hold a role on the MOT Testing Service (MTS). This now explicitly includes AE Consultants (AECs), ensuring a broader range of personnel involved in the MOT process meet the necessary integrity standards.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What are the primary changes to the disciplinary point system?

The core point values remain largely consistent, but the descriptions for incurring points are now more precisely defined. They explicitly reference defects categorised as 'dangerous', 'major', or 'minor' within the relevant MOT inspection manual, ensuring clearer application of penalties based on the severity of the missed or incorrectly identified defect.

Is a DBS check now mandatory for new MOT Testers?

Yes, as of 1 April 2022, new individuals applying to become MOT Testers are required to undergo a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check as part of their eligibility criteria.

How much time does a newly authorised VTS have to start testing?

A newly authorised VTS must appoint a DVSA approved tester and commence MOT testing within 12 months of its approval date. Failure to do so will result in the VTS being deemed to have surrendered its approval.

What happens if our AE Designated Manager (AEDM) leaves the business?

If your AEDM departs, you now have 35 working days to replace them. The updated guidance provides a clear and consistent timeframe for finding and appointing a suitable replacement to ensure continuity of your VTS operations.

Are there any new training requirements for Authorised Examiners (AEs)?

Yes, for new AEs, both an AE Principal and the AE Designated Manager (AEDM) for that AE are now required to attend a DVSA approved MOT Managers course. This strengthens the foundational knowledge and understanding of responsibilities for key personnel.

These comprehensive updates to the MOT Testing Guide are designed to enhance the robustness and reliability of the MOT service across the UK. For every Authorised Examiner and Tester, understanding and adapting to these changes is not merely a bureaucratic exercise but a vital step in maintaining operational integrity, ensuring road safety, and safeguarding your VTS against potential disciplinary actions. Regular review of the official guidance remains crucial to ensure ongoing compliance and continued success within the MOT scheme.

If you want to read more articles similar to Key MOT Guide Updates: Disciplinary Points & Roles, you can visit the Automotive category.

Go up