18/08/2001
When delving into the world of automotive performance, particularly with suspension upgrades, it's crucial to understand that simply bolting on new parts won't guarantee immediate improvements. Achieving optimal handling is a nuanced process that involves careful adjustments, tuning, and a deep understanding of how individual components interact. The suspension system, in fact, is arguably the most intricate system in any performance vehicle. While many enthusiasts focus on stiffer dampers, springs, and sway bars, the effectiveness of the entire system is also heavily influenced by the lengths, angles, and connection points of its various links.

This feature will delve into the critical concepts of roll centre, centre of gravity (CG), and their relationship with wheel alignments, all in the pursuit of enhanced handling performance.
The Misconceptions of Suspension Tuning
From street-tuned machines to even some levels of professional racing, a common pitfall is the 'monkey see, monkey do' approach to modifications. It's time to address some pervasive misconceptions. Simply lowering your car, introducing negative camber, fitting stiffer springs, thicker sway bars, or altering damper valving doesn't automatically translate to better handling. The ideal adjustments are highly dependent on the specific vehicle chassis and its existing suspension geometry. For instance, the five degrees of front negative camber found on a Formula One car is meticulously calibrated for its unique suspension design and stiffness. Applying the same five degrees of camber to a standard road car would, in reality, degrade its handling capabilities.
Before making any adjustments to your car's suspension, it's imperative to grasp how these changes will affect the chassis, weight transfer (often referred to as 'weight jacking'), and alignment. Understanding why a car might understeer or oversteer is key. If the issue stems from changing camber angles as the body rolls, then merely adjusting damper valving is akin to treating a symptom rather than the root cause. Therefore, before indiscriminately fitting parts or altering settings, take a moment to analyse the problem, identify the underlying causes, and understand which components directly influence them. Many of these handling characteristics are fundamentally determined by the suspension geometry and its interplay with the car's roll centre and centre of gravity.
Understanding Your Vehicle's Centres
While many suspension upgrades are marketed with the promise of reducing body roll, it's essential to consider other vital factors. The suspension geometry dictates both the roll centre and the centre of gravity. The roll centre is, in essence, the theoretical point around which a vehicle pivots as it experiences lateral forces, influencing how weight shifts through the suspension during cornering. A car has a front roll centre and a rear roll centre, which together define the 'roll axis' of the vehicle. It's important to remember that the roll centre influences the direction of weight transfer but not the magnitude of that transfer. For our purposes, focusing on side-to-side handling, we'll visualise the roll centre and CG as if viewing the car from the front.
Determining the Roll Centre
The roll centre can be geometrically determined by drawing specific lines. For a given side of the car, extend two straight lines that represent the upper and lower suspension links until they intersect. In a strut suspension setup, one of these lines would follow the angle of the top of the strut. Then, draw a third line from the centre of the tyre's contact patch on the ground, extending to the point where the first two lines met. This intersection point is known as the 'instant centre'. Repeating this process for both sides of the car will reveal the roll centre where the two 'contact patch to instant centre' lines intersect. If the suspension links are perfectly parallel, these lines may never meet, in which case the roll centre is considered to be at ground level.
It's crucial to note that as a car brakes, accelerates, or corners, the angles of the suspension arms change. This dynamic movement causes the instant centres for each side to shift, consequently altering the position of the roll centre. Automotive engineers typically aim to keep the roll centre's movement within a three-inch range, as significant deviations can lead to undesirable handling characteristics.
Calculating the Centre of Gravity (CG)
The centre of gravity is conceptually simpler to understand but can be more challenging to calculate precisely without specific tools. The vertical centre of gravity refers to the height at which the car's entire mass is concentrated. Unlike the roll centre, altering the CG's height directly impacts the amount of weight transferred during acceleration, braking, or cornering. Consider the stark contrast between a school bus, with its exceptionally high CG, and a go-kart, which boasts a very low CG. Fortunately, several online resources, such as Longacre's Tech Library, provide useful calculators to determine your car's CG height. The general process involves weighing the car on a level surface, then raising the rear of the car by at least 10 inches and weighing the front end. The collected data can then be used in specific formulas or plugged into an online calculator.
The Interplay Between Roll Centre and CG
While body roll is a frequently discussed topic, its fundamental causes – the roll centre and CG – are often overlooked. These two elements work in tandem, either enhancing or detracting from a car's handling and its ability to transfer weight effectively. A greater distance between the CG and the roll centre results in more pronounced body roll during cornering. Imagine swinging a heavy object like a mallet; your hand acts as the roll centre, and the head of the mallet, where the mass is concentrated, represents the CG. The further the mallet head (CG) is from your hand (roll centre), the more effort is required to initiate and stop the swing. Conversely, as the CG and roll centre move closer together, the car's mass has less leverage to resist changes in motion, leading to improved responsiveness. However, it's vital to avoid having the roll centre and CG coincide precisely, as this would eliminate body roll altogether, thereby negating the suspension's ability to transfer weight.
To illustrate these concepts, let's consider a double wishbone suspension configuration. These examples highlight how different suspension arm lengths and angles influence camber changes as the chassis rolls laterally.
Suspension Geometry and Alignment
The principles discussed so far pertain to a static vehicle and do not account for dynamic alignment changes. A common issue encountered in many stock vehicles, and often exacerbated by modifications, is unwanted alignment shifts during cornering. An ideal suspension setup aims to maintain the largest possible tyre contact patch with the road, ensuring the wheels remain perpendicular to the track surface throughout a corner. Unfortunately, achieving perfect camber control is exceptionally difficult without a complete redesign of the suspension system.
The lengths of the upper and lower suspension links play a significant role in a car's performance as the chassis rolls or as the suspension compresses and rebounds. If these links were of equal length and perfectly parallel, chassis roll would cause the inside wheel to gain excessive negative camber, while the outside wheel would experience an equal amount of detrimental positive camber. To mitigate this, most road and race car designs employ a parallelogram-like structure for the suspension mounting points on the chassis.
The Parallelogram Effect
A parallelogram chassis configuration typically features a longer lower suspension link and a shorter upper link. This design means the upper link has a shorter arc of movement compared to the lower link as the suspension articulates. This geometry promotes an increase in negative camber as the body pitches or as the wheels move upwards into the chassis. Shortening the upper link or lengthening the lower link results in a more aggressive camber change curve. When the links in this configuration are parallel, the outside wheel experiences less positive camber shift, but the inside wheel can suffer from excessive negative camber. Employing unequal length links that are non-parallel can further optimise camber conditions. However, this can introduce a greater negative effect during bump travel when combined with body roll, due to the sharp angles demanded of the upper link.
As with many tuning factors in performance driving, there are inherent trade-offs to consider. Different suspension geometries present unique advantages and disadvantages, which are also influenced by factors such as tyres, chassis characteristics, track surface, and other subtle details. Given that most production cars come with a fixed, and often difficult-to-alter, suspension geometry, this information serves primarily as a reference to better understand camber curves rather than a direct guide for making physical changes. However, understanding these principles is invaluable when selecting aftermarket suspension components.
Optimising Your Car's Setup
How do these concepts directly apply to your car's setup? If you've observed high-performance racing machines like IndyCars or Formula One cars, you might have noticed their exceptionally long suspension arms relative to those found on production road cars. These longer arms effectively increase the radius of the wheel's camber curve, thereby minimising camber change during body roll or suspension compression. Since road cars typically lack these specialised features and offer limited freedom to alter suspension arm lengths and angles, the focus shifts to other areas for improvement. Much of your effort will likely be directed towards optimising your car's roll centre and centre of gravity, with a keen awareness of how the existing suspension geometry will respond to these changes.
Visualising Suspension Geometry
To truly appreciate how suspension geometries influence camber characteristics, you can create a physical model. Using metal brads or a similar fastening method allows you to connect the suspension components, enabling them to pivot and rotate freely. This hands-on approach provides a tangible understanding of the complex interactions at play. Many engineering texts offer templates for such models. Printing these diagrams on heavy cardstock and assembling them will allow you to visualise precisely how body roll, bump, and rebound affect camber angles.
Setting Your Goals for Improvement
Your primary goals when tuning these elements should be to lower the centre of gravity as much as practically possible. Subsequently, aim to position the roll centre as close as possible to, and ideally underneath, the centre of gravity. This strategic placement minimises body roll while still allowing for effective weight jacking and enabling the suspension to perform its intended functions. Conversely, excessively lowering your car can inadvertently drop the roll centre to an undesirable low position. To rectify this, adjustments to the suspension's pivot points are necessary. Simple solutions like ball joint spacers or taller ball joints can effectively reposition these critical points to a more optimal location.
Manufacturers like SPC Performance offer adjustable ball joints tailored for numerous vehicle applications. Similarly, companies such as Whiteline provide roll centre correction kits for a wide range of platforms, including the Subaru WRX. These types of adjustments become essential for correcting suspension geometry when significant alterations to the vehicle's ride height are made.
Understanding Roll Centre Placement
The front roll centre of a car typically sits lower than the rear roll centre, creating a downward-sloping roll axis. It's vital to be mindful of your setup changes, as adjustments made at one end of the car will invariably affect the other. A lower front roll centre can promote more 'throttle steering' and smoother weight transfer but may reduce steering responsiveness. Conversely, a higher front roll centre generally enhances responsiveness. At the rear, a lower roll centre can improve rear grip, particularly when accelerating, but might compromise traction under braking. A higher rear roll centre, however, boosts responsiveness but can make the car more challenging to handle. As with any tuning parameter, each vehicle requires a specific balance to achieve the desired driving characteristics.
Ultimately, an ideal suspension setup will minimise slow and excessive body roll while still permitting weight to transfer quickly and efficiently during cornering, thereby maximising grip and stability.
Key Takeaways and Factors to Consider
The suspension system is, without question, one of the most complex elements of any automobile. While we've covered the fundamental aspects of suspension geometries, roll centres, and centres of gravity, numerous other factors warrant consideration once these core elements are understood. When diagnosing an undesirable handling characteristic, it's crucial to trace the chain of events that occur throughout the suspension system. Components such as springs, dampers, sway bars, chassis braces, and tyres all interact and influence each other, and these interdependencies must be factored into any tuning process.
There are countless ways to tune a car to match your personal driving style and optimise handling, just as there are numerous ways to inadvertently compromise its performance. The key to achieving the perfect setup lies in making one change at a time and rigorously testing the results of each modification. This methodical approach ensures that you can accurately attribute any improvements or degradations in handling to the specific changes made, allowing for a more informed and effective tuning process.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: What is the roll centre of a car?
A1: The roll centre is a theoretical point around which the car's body pivots during cornering, influencing how weight is transferred through the suspension.
Q2: How does the centre of gravity affect handling?
A2: The height of the centre of gravity directly impacts the amount of weight transfer during acceleration, braking, and cornering. A lower CG generally leads to less body roll and improved stability.
Q3: Can I easily change my car's roll centre and CG?
A3: While the CG can be lowered by removing weight or using lighter components, significantly altering the roll centre often requires modifying suspension geometry, which can be complex and may necessitate specialised parts like adjustable ball joints or roll centre correction kits.
Q4: Why is understanding these concepts important for suspension upgrades?
A4: Understanding the interplay between the roll centre and CG helps you predict how suspension modifications will affect your car's handling, allowing for more effective tuning and avoiding common pitfalls that can worsen performance.
Q5: What is the ideal relationship between the roll centre and CG?
A5: Ideally, the roll centre should be positioned as close as possible to, and ideally underneath, the centre of gravity. This minimises body roll while still allowing for controlled weight transfer.
If you want to read more articles similar to Understanding Car Suspension: Roll Centre and CG, you can visit the Automotive category.
