Can you convert a carbureted engine to fuel injection?

Retrofitting Carburettors to a Fuel-Injected Car

15/08/2005

Rating: 4.4 (14072 votes)

In an era dominated by advanced electronics and sophisticated fuel injection systems, the idea of replacing a perfectly functional fuel injection setup with old-school carburettors might seem counter-intuitive, even a step backwards. However, for some enthusiasts, this bold move represents a pathway to greater mechanical simplicity, enhanced control, and a unique driving experience. It’s an automotive adventure that defies the digital tide, promising easier maintenance and a more visceral connection to the machine. Join us as we delve into the intricate details of such a project, inspired by a real-world endeavour to transform a fuel-injected classic.

Can You retrofit a fuel injected car with Weber carburetors?
In this series we’ll present the details of retrofitting a fuel-injected car (Bosch LH Jetronic 2.2) with old-style Weber carburetors and replacing his nonprogrammable Chrysler electronic ignition system with a programmable distributor called 123Tune.
Table

The Allure of Carburettors: A Step Backwards or Forward?

Modern vehicles are marvels of engineering, brimming with sensors, electronic control units (ECUs), and intricate wiring harnesses designed for optimal performance, fuel efficiency, and emissions control. While undeniably effective, this complexity can be daunting, particularly for owners of older cars facing deteriorating wiring or expensive component failures. The appeal of carburettors lies in their mechanical straightforwardness. They are less reliant on complex electronics, potentially offering a more robust and easier-to-diagnose system, especially for those with a penchant for hands-on maintenance.

Our case study follows Carl Bauske and his beloved 1986 Volvo 245 wagon, affectionately named “Buster.” This resilient vehicle has been a fixture in SCCA autocross events in Central Virginia for two decades, racking up an impressive 278,000 miles. Despite its age and mileage, Buster's original 2.3-litre in-line 4-cylinder engine, featuring 5 main bearings, a cast iron block, and an aluminium cross-flow cylinder head with 8 valves, remains remarkably robust and unmodified internally. Currently running a Bosch LH Jetronic 2.2 fuel injection system and a non-programmable Chrysler electronic ignition, Buster is set for a significant transformation: a complete conversion to Weber carburettors and a programmable ignition system.

"Buster": Our Test Subject

Buster's current setup includes a simple, durable engine that has never been rebuilt or overhauled. While not designed for competitive racing against lighter, more powerful cars, its longevity and reliability have made it a perfect companion for two decades of fun on the autocross track. The class Buster competes in, F Street Prepared (FSP), allows for certain modifications to the induction, ignition, and exhaust systems, but strictly prohibits changes to the internal parts of the original engine type. This restriction significantly shapes the project's parameters.

On the exhaust side, Buster already benefits from an upgraded system, utilising components from a Volvo 240 Turbo. The original 4-into-two manifold and 2-into-one headpipe are considered efficient enough, offering minimal resistance to flow, negating the immediate need for an aftermarket header.

The Retrofit Blueprint: What's Involved?

The conversion of Buster from fuel injection to carburettors is a multi-step process, meticulously planned to ensure compatibility and performance while adhering to the class rules. The core steps, leaving the engine internals untouched, are as follows:

  1. Establish a performance baseline on a chassis dynamometer.
  2. Replace the intake manifold and throttle body with one compatible with two 45DCOE Weber two-barrel side-draft carburettors.
  3. Modify the fuel supply system to deliver fuel at a significantly lower pressure.
  4. Replace the existing throttle linkage with a suitable setup.
  5. Replace the distributor and ignition controller with a new programmable unit.
  6. Install an electric vacuum pump for the brake booster and HVAC controls.
  7. Remove all redundant under-bonnet components.
  8. Re-run the car on the dynamometer to tune the new induction and ignition systems for optimum performance.

Establishing a Baseline: The Dyno Run

The initial step, establishing a baseline, was crucial. Buster was put through three dyno pulls at EFI Performance in Richmond, Virginia. During these runs, Buster achieved 119 mph in fourth gear at 6100 engine rpm. The data gathered confirmed that Buster was performing as well as it did when new, matching factory specifications for engine output: 115 horsepower at 5000 rpm and 130 ft-lbs of torque from 2750 to 4000 rpm.

However, exhaust analysis revealed a critical detail: Buster's fuel mixture at wide-open throttle (WOT) varied from a lean 15.5:1 at 2000 rpm to a stoichiometric 14.5:1 at 6000 rpm. The EFI technicians highlighted that running so lean meant leaving power on the table, suggesting an ideal ratio of 13.5:1 for maximum power. Unfortunately, the Bosch 2.2 system on Buster offers no direct adjustment for WOT fuel mix other than raising fuel pressure, and the Volvo fuel pressure regulator is non-adjustable, being controlled by intake manifold absolute pressure (MAP).

The Heart of the Conversion: Weber 45DCOE Carburettors

The choice of Weber carburettors is a testament to their legendary reputation. Since Edoardo Weber's pioneering work in 1925, creating hop-up kits for Fiats, Weber has been synonymous with performance, gracing everything from production powerhouses like Alfa Romeo and Ferrari to aftermarket conversions for street and race cars. The specific choice for Buster is the Weber 45DCOE. The nomenclature breaks down as follows:

  • 45: 45 mm diameter of the throttle plates.
  • DC: Doppio Corpo (double barrels), indicating two barrels per carburettor.
  • O: Orizzontale (side-draft), meaning the carburettors mount horizontally.
  • E: Enrichment, signifying it's fitted with an enrichment circuit for cold starting.

Webers are celebrated for their fine workmanship and relative ease of tuning. Features like throttle shafts turning in ball bearings and selectable venturi sizes underscore their engineering quality. The 45DCOE design allows for easy removal and replacement of all jets by simply removing a small cover, without spilling fuel or needing to remove air cleaners. The trade-off, however, is that unlike modern self-tuning EFI systems, Webers demand manual tuning to achieve optimal performance.

Fuel System Overhaul

A crucial aspect of the conversion involves radically altering the fuel delivery system. The existing Bosch EFI system operates at a high pressure of 36 psi, whereas the Weber carburettors require a significantly lower pressure of approximately 3.5 psi. This necessitates a complete modification of the fuel lines and the inclusion of a suitable pressure regulator. Furthermore, the control of Buster's two fuel pumps must be removed from the Bosch 2.2 ECU and rewired for manual operation, ensuring a constant, low-pressure supply to the carburettors.

Ignition System Upgrade: The 123Tune Distributor

Complementing the carburettor conversion is the replacement of Buster's non-programmable Chrysler electronic ignition system with a programmable 123Tune distributor, manufactured by Albertronic in the Netherlands. This upgrade provides complete control over ignition advance timing, a vital component for optimising performance with the new carburettor setup, allowing for precise adjustments that were impossible with the old system.

Why Webers? Unlocking Potential (or Just Simplicity)

The decision to use Webers on a stock engine, especially one performing at factory specifications, might seem unconventional. Typically, Weber conversions accompany significant internal engine modifications such as camshaft changes, larger valves, porting, and increased compression ratios, all aimed at improving engine breathing. However, given the FSP class rules, these internal modifications are not an option for Buster.

Despite the lack of internal engine modifications, there's an expectation of improvement, or at least a better-controlled system. Interestingly, Buster's dyno results showed 115 horsepower and 130 ft-lbs at the wheels, which is equivalent to or even slightly more than the factory flywheel ratings. This anomaly is attributed to a few factors: the replacement of the mechanical fan with an electric one, the upgraded turbo exhaust system, and Volvo's historical tendency to underrate their engine outputs.

The search for suitable parts led to KGTrimning, a go-fast shop for Volvos in Sweden. Although they warned against bolting Webers onto a stock engine, they were instrumental in supplying the incredibly hard-to-find parts needed for this project in the US. This highlights a common challenge in such retrofits: sourcing specific, often vintage, components.

Expected Gains and the Uncharted Waters

What are the realistic expectations from such a comprehensive retrofit? Truthfully, the exact performance gains are uncertain, as this project ventures into uncharted waters for Buster's specific setup. Analysing the individual components of the original induction system reveals a seemingly well-designed intake manifold with minimal restriction, and a 56 mm throttle body deemed sufficient for a 2.3-litre engine at 6000 rpm.

However, one potential area for improvement lies in the Mass Air Flow (MAF) sensor (also known as an Air Mass Meter, AMM). The MAF sensor, with its wire screens and internal structures, can act as a restriction in the air stream. While other EFI systems exist without MAF sensors, they are often expensive and would still require a new ECU and ignition system. By removing the EFI system, the MAF sensor is eliminated, potentially freeing up airflow.

Is a fuel injection better than a carburetor?
Both the fuel injector and carburetor offer better horsepower, but the fuel injection can only deliver about 10 extra horsepower at peak. This is the ability to constantly be tuning the intake fuel and air in each cylinder that’s advantageous to the performance. There is less vibration in an engine with a fuel injection system.

Beyond performance, a significant benefit is the simplification of the engine compartment wiring. The original fuel injection wiring harness, which wraps around the engine, has been deteriorating for years, with dozens of wires becoming bare. Switching to carburettors drastically reduces the complexity of this wiring, offering a cleaner, more reliable setup.

The primary hope is for a modest improvement in performance, coupled with complete control over fuel mixture and ignition advance timing. While a dramatic increase in power might not be feasible without internal engine modifications, the 36mm venturis of the Weber's four barrels should remove any external induction system limitations, potentially leading to some improvement in torque and horsepower. Ultimately, this project is also about the sheer fun, challenge, and automotive adventure of cleaning up a tangled mess of decaying wires and hoses, replacing them with a visually appealing pair of Webers. It might even serve as a harbinger for how older cars are maintained and restored in an increasingly electronic world.

Key Considerations for a Carburettor Retrofit

Embarking on a carburettor retrofit involves several critical considerations beyond the core installation:

Mechanical Fuel Pumps

For those opting for a mechanical fuel pump, it's crucial to understand that many fuel-injected engines' timing covers are not designed to accommodate them. Often, a different front timing cover is required to provide the necessary mounting point and drive for a mechanical fuel pump. This is a significant consideration that can add complexity and cost to the conversion.

Tuning

One of the most significant differences between carburettors and EFI is the need for manual tuning. While EFI systems self-adjust to varying conditions, carburettors require careful adjustment of jets, air bleeds, and idle screws to achieve optimal performance across the engine's RPM range and under different loads. This can be a time-consuming process that requires patience and a good understanding of carburettor dynamics.

Fitment

Physical space under the bonnet is often a limiting factor. The new intake manifold and carburettors must fit without fouling other components. This can be a "show-stopper" if not carefully planned, potentially leading to significant fabrication work or even abandoning the project.

Legality and Emissions

It's important to note that modifying a vehicle's emissions control system, which a carburettor retrofit fundamentally does, can have legal implications. In many regions, including parts of the UK, significant alterations that affect exhaust emissions may prevent a vehicle from passing its annual MOT test or being legally driven on public roads. This project for Buster is primarily for autocross, where rules differ from road legality.

EFI vs. Carburettors: A Comparative Look

To better understand the implications of such a retrofit, let's compare the fundamental characteristics of Fuel Injection and Carburettor systems:

FeatureFuel Injection (EFI)Carburettors
ComplexityHigh (numerous sensors, ECU, complex wiring)Low (mechanical, fewer electronic components)
Fuel EfficiencyGenerally superior (precise fuel atomisation and delivery)Can be good, but less precise across varying conditions
EmissionsLower (optimised combustion for cleaner exhaust)Higher (less precise control, potential for richer/leaner mixtures)
MaintenanceRequires diagnostic tools for electronic faults; component replacement often simplerMechanical adjustments; easier for DIY enthusiasts; requires regular tuning
AdaptabilitySelf-adjusting to altitude, temperature, engine load changesManual adjustments required for significant environmental changes or engine mods
Cold StartingExcellent (electronic control of cold-start enrichment)Can be tricky; relies on choke mechanism; less consistent
Cost (New Systems)Higher for full standalone systems; replacement parts can be expensiveGenerally lower for performance setups; simpler components
WiringComplex, extensive harness prone to deterioration over timeMuch simpler, fewer wires, less prone to electronic issues

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Is it worth replacing modern EFI with carburettors?

A: Whether it's "worth it" depends entirely on your goals. For those seeking maximum fuel economy, low emissions, and hassle-free operation, modern EFI is superior. However, for enthusiasts who value mechanical simplicity, a classic driving feel, or are participating in specific racing classes with lenient modification rules, a carburettor retrofit can be incredibly rewarding. It’s often more about the journey and the hands-on control than purely about performance gains.

Q: What are the biggest challenges of such a retrofit?

A: The primary challenges include adapting the fuel delivery system to drastically different pressure requirements, correctly integrating a programmable ignition system, ensuring physical fitment of the new manifold and carburettors within the engine bay, and, crucially, mastering the art of carburettor tuning to achieve optimal performance and drivability across all conditions.

Q: Do I need a different camshaft or timing cover for carburettors?

A: A different camshaft is generally not required unless you are also planning internal engine modifications (like larger valves or porting) specifically designed to maximise carburettor performance. However, if you intend to use a mechanical fuel pump, a different front timing cover is often necessary, as many EFI engines do not have the provision for a mechanical pump drive. If sticking with an electric fuel pump (which is common for carburettor conversions), the timing cover usually doesn't need to be changed.

Q: Will this project increase my car's power significantly?

A: Not necessarily. While improvements are hoped for, especially by removing potential restrictions like the MAF sensor and gaining finer control over fuel and ignition, the primary goal might be simplicity, enhanced drivability, or adhering to specific class rules, particularly when no internal engine modifications are planned. Significant power gains often require a holistic approach, including camshafts, cylinder head work, and increased compression.

Q: Is retrofitting carburettors legal for road use in the UK?

A: Modifying a vehicle's emissions control system, such as replacing EFI with carburettors, can make it challenging to pass the MOT (Ministry of Transport) test in the UK, especially regarding emissions standards. While older cars might have less stringent requirements, it's crucial to check current regulations. Projects like Buster's are often undertaken for off-road or track use, where different rules apply.

The Road Ahead and Future Possibilities

The journey with Buster is far from over. The next crucial step involves removing the current manifold and test-fitting the new carburettor manifold. This stage is critical, as any fitment issues could be a "show-stopper." Should the parts not fit, they might find their way onto eBay!

Looking further down the road, if Buster's engine ever gives up, the option remains to build a new engine with internal improvements. While this would bump the car into a more competitive "modified" class, it represents another exciting adventure for a car that has already given so much. To hear Buster on the dynamometer, spinning at 6000 rpm at WOT, it's truly remarkable how an engine with 278,000 miles can hold together so well.

Ultimately, this carburettor retrofit is more than just a mechanical undertaking; it’s a passion project, a learning experience, and a testament to the enduring appeal of hands-on automotive engineering. It’s about reclaiming control and enjoying the tactile satisfaction of transforming a vehicle, wire by decaying wire, hose by rotting hose, into a beautifully simplified machine.

If you want to read more articles similar to Retrofitting Carburettors to a Fuel-Injected Car, you can visit the Automotive category.

Go up