Can I use HH & GG pads in the rear?

Brake Pads: HH & GG on Your Rear Axle?

14/12/2006

Rating: 4.55 (9486 votes)

When it comes to your vehicle's braking system, understanding the nuances of components like brake pads is paramount for both performance and, more importantly, safety. Brake pads are not just simple friction materials; they are engineered with specific characteristics, one of the most critical being their friction rating. You've likely seen these represented by two letters, such as 'HH' or 'GG'. But what do these letters truly signify, and can you mix and match them, particularly on your car's rear axle? This detailed guide will delve into the science behind these ratings, the concept of braking bias, and the crucial implications of selecting the correct pads for your vehicle's rear.

Can I use HH & GG pads in the rear?
Table

Deciphering Brake Pad Friction Ratings

The two-letter code found on brake pads, like 'HH' or 'GG', is a standardised system established by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE J866) to indicate the pad's friction coefficient. The first letter represents the pad's friction when cold (up to 250°F or 121°C), and the second letter represents its friction when hot (between 300°F and 600°F or 149°C and 316°C). The letters correspond to a specific range of friction coefficients:

  • C: 0.00-0.15
  • D: 0.15-0.25
  • E: 0.25-0.35
  • F: 0.35-0.45
  • G: 0.45-0.55
  • H: 0.55-0.65
  • Z: 0.65+ (often used for very high-performance or racing applications)

Therefore, an 'HH' rated pad indicates a high friction coefficient (0.55-0.65) at both cold and hot temperatures. This generally translates to aggressive stopping power and consistent performance under demanding conditions. An 'GG' rated pad, on the other hand, signifies a medium-high friction coefficient (0.45-0.55) at both cold and hot temperatures. These pads offer good stopping power and are often found on standard road cars, providing a good balance of performance, noise, and wear characteristics.

Understanding Braking Bias: The Front-to-Rear Dynamic

To fully grasp the implications of using different brake pad ratings on the front and rear axles, it's essential to understand the concept of braking bias. When you apply the brakes in a vehicle, the weight of the car shifts forward. This phenomenon, known as 'weight transfer', means that the front wheels experience a significantly greater load than the rear wheels. Consequently, the front brakes are designed to do the majority of the stopping work – typically between 70% and 80% of the total braking force. The rear brakes, while contributing less to outright stopping power, are crucial for vehicle stability during braking, especially under heavy deceleration or in adverse conditions.

Maintaining the correct braking bias is critical. If the rear brakes lock up before the front brakes, the vehicle can become highly unstable, leading to a loss of control, particularly a dangerous spin. This is why vehicle manufacturers meticulously design the braking system, including caliper sizes, piston counts, and rotor diameters, to ensure the front brakes always have a higher bias and are less likely to lock up prematurely compared to the rear. Modern vehicles with Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) and Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD) help manage this, but they are safety nets, not substitutes for a fundamentally balanced brake setup.

Can You Use HH & GG Pads in the Rear?

Now, let's address the core question directly. The short answer is: it depends on the specific combination and, crucially, which axle receives the higher friction pad.

Scenario 1: HH Pads on Front, HH Pads on Rear

This is a common setup for performance-oriented vehicles or drivers seeking maximum stopping power. Using HH pads front and rear ensures a consistent, high level of friction across both axles. As long as the vehicle's braking system is designed to handle this increased stopping force (e.g., adequate caliper and rotor size), this setup is generally safe and effective. It provides a balanced, aggressive brake feel.

Scenario 2: GG Pads on Front, GG Pads on Rear

This is a typical factory setup for many standard road cars. GG pads offer good, reliable braking performance for everyday driving conditions. Using them on both axles provides a consistent and predictable brake feel, maintaining the designed braking bias. This combination is perfectly safe and suitable for the vast majority of drivers.

Scenario 3: HH Pads on Front, GG Pads on Rear

This combination is generally acceptable and often recommended for a slight performance upgrade without compromising safety. By having higher friction pads (HH) on the front, where most of the braking work occurs, and slightly lower friction pads (GG) on the rear, you maintain the critical front braking bias. The front axle takes the brunt of the braking, while the rear provides stable support. This can lead to improved stopping distances and better fade resistance for the front brakes under heavier use, without the risk of the rear wheels locking up prematurely.

Scenario 4: GG Pads on Front, HH Pads on Rear – A Dangerous Combination

This is the combination that should be vehemently avoided. Placing higher friction coefficient pads (HH) on the rear axle and lower friction pads (GG) on the front axle fundamentally alters the vehicle's designed braking bias. In this scenario, the rear brakes will generate significantly more stopping force relative to the front brakes than intended. Under moderate to hard braking, especially in wet conditions or during an emergency stop, this setup dramatically increases the risk of premature rear lock-up. A locked rear axle can lead to:

  • Loss of directional stability
  • Dangerous spins or fishtailing
  • Significantly increased stopping distances
  • Compromised effectiveness of ABS and EBD systems, as they might struggle to compensate for such a severe imbalance.

Even with advanced electronic stability systems, an inherently imbalanced mechanical setup is a recipe for disaster. These systems are designed to correct minor imbalances, not to completely override a fundamentally incorrect brake pad configuration.

Factors to Consider Beyond Friction Ratings

While friction ratings are paramount, several other factors influence your brake pad choice:

  • Vehicle Manufacturer Recommendations: Always consult your vehicle's owner's manual or a reputable mechanic. Manufacturers specify brake pad types that are best suited for the vehicle's weight, performance, and intended use.
  • Driving Style: Aggressive drivers or those who frequently tow or carry heavy loads might benefit from higher friction, more fade-resistant pads (like HH). Everyday commuters might find GG pads perfectly adequate.
  • Brake Pad Material: Friction ratings don't tell the whole story about the pad material itself. Common types include:
    • Organic (NAO): Quieter, less rotor wear, but lower friction and fade resistance.
    • Semi-Metallic: Good friction, durable, but can be noisy and dusty.
    • Ceramic: Quiet, low dust, good performance, but can be expensive.
  • Rotor Compatibility: Some aggressive pads can cause accelerated wear on standard rotors. Ensure your rotors are compatible with your chosen pads.
  • ABS and EBD Systems: While these systems are designed to prevent wheel lock-up and optimise braking force distribution, they operate best when the underlying mechanical brake system is correctly balanced. Mismatched pads can overwork these systems or even cause them to intervene unnecessarily.

The Importance of Proper Installation and Bedding-In

Regardless of the friction rating, correct installation is crucial. Ensure all caliper components are clean, lubricated (where appropriate), and functioning correctly. Once new pads are installed, they need to be properly 'bedding-in'. This process involves a series of moderate and progressively harder stops to transfer a thin, even layer of friction material onto the brake rotors. Proper bedding-in ensures optimal performance, reduces noise, and prevents glazing of the pads and rotors. Failure to bed-in pads correctly can lead to reduced braking performance and uneven wear.

Comparative Table: HH vs. GG Brake Pads

To summarise the key differences, here's a comparative overview:

CharacteristicHH Rated PadsGG Rated Pads
Friction Coefficient (Cold & Hot)High (0.55-0.65)Medium-High (0.45-0.55)
Stopping PowerExcellent, aggressive biteGood, reliable stopping
Fade ResistanceVery Good (especially under heavy use)Good (for standard use)
Typical ApplicationPerformance vehicles, heavy-duty, spirited drivingStandard road cars, daily commuting
Noise PotentialPotentially higher (depending on material)Generally lower
Rotor WearPotentially higherStandard
CostOften higherStandard

Frequently Asked Questions About Brake Pads

Q1: Can I mix different brands of brake pads on the same axle?

It is strongly advised against mixing different brands or even different models of brake pads on the same axle. Even if they have the same friction rating, different manufacturers use proprietary friction materials that can have varying characteristics (e.g., how they react to heat, their wear rate, or their initial bite). This can lead to uneven braking performance, premature wear on one side, and unpredictable behaviour.

Q2: How often should I replace my brake pads?

Brake pad lifespan varies significantly depending on driving style, vehicle type, pad material, and road conditions. As a general rule, they should be inspected at every service interval (typically every 10,000-15,000 miles or annually). Many pads have wear indicators that produce a squealing sound when they are low. Some vehicles also have electronic wear sensors. Always replace them before they wear down to the backing plate, which can damage the rotors.

Q3: Do I need to replace brake rotors when I change pads?

Not always, but it's often a good idea. Rotors should be replaced if they are below the minimum thickness specification, severely grooved, warped, or cracked. If they are still within spec and in good condition, they can sometimes be resurfaced (machined) to provide a fresh, flat surface for the new pads. However, with the decreasing cost of new rotors, outright replacement is often the more practical and safer option.

Q4: What are the signs of worn brake pads?

Common signs include a squealing or grinding noise when braking (indicating worn pads or metal-on-metal contact), a longer stopping distance, a vibrating steering wheel or brake pedal (often due to warped rotors), and the brake warning light illuminating on your dashboard. A visual inspection of the pad thickness is also a good indicator.

Q5: Is it normal for new brake pads to make noise?

Some noise can be normal during the initial bedding-in period as the pads and rotors adapt to each other. A slight squeal or groan may occur. However, persistent loud squealing or grinding after the bedding-in period is complete usually indicates an issue, such as improper installation, contaminated pads, or a faulty component.

Conclusion

The choice of brake pads for your vehicle's rear axle is not a decision to be taken lightly. While HH and GG pads both offer effective stopping power, their application must be carefully considered in the context of your vehicle's overall braking bias. For optimal safety and performance, always prioritise maintaining a front-heavy braking bias. This means that having HH pads on the front and GG pads on the rear is generally acceptable, and even beneficial for some, but placing HH pads on the rear with GG pads on the front is a dangerous configuration that can lead to severe instability and loss of control. When in doubt, always refer to your vehicle's manufacturer recommendations or consult a qualified mechanic. Your safety, and that of others on the road, depends on a well-maintained and correctly configured braking system.

If you want to read more articles similar to Brake Pads: HH & GG on Your Rear Axle?, you can visit the Brakes category.

Go up